The Academic - Practitioner (Non)-Divide

In the past, when I renewed my membership to the Institute for Operations Research and Management sciences (INFORMS), one of the questions I was asked to answer to update my membership profile bothered me.  The question provided only two checkboxes, of which only one could be selected.  Specifically, I was asked to identify myself as primarily an "Academic" OR a "Practitioner" (of Operations Research, or OR).  (Note the two different uses of the word/acronymn "OR" in the previous sentence.)

However, I consider myself to be both an academic AND a practitioner.  If you consider there to be a fence or dividing line between the two, I would say that I have one foot firmly on the ground on either side of it.  But, I don't see it as being quite so clear cut.  For OR practitioners, it is important to have a solid academic background supporting your work.  Similarly, to be a good academic, having practical experience is invaluable to both teaching and research efforts.

Upon renewing my membership for 2013, I noticed that the question is now more clear in that it asks for the "primary employment classification" and offers five choices -- academic, government, business, consulting, retired/underemployed/other.  And, there is another question that allows members to specify the various roles that they perform.

DISCLAIMER: This is my personal website and blog.  While I am currently an officer in the United States Army, any opinions posted here are my own and do not represent a position of the United States Government, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Army.
CONTACT INFO:
  scott [at] nestler.com  © Nestler Analytics 2014